Curated Databases vs. Google Scholar: The Great Debate!
The materials in a curated database have been selected, organized, and looked after by someone.
Advantages of the curated databases recommended below:
- The search interface and ability to refine results are typically much more powerful. Therefore:
- You can pinpoint your search to the most relevant results rather than wading through thousands of irrelevant results.
- Google Scholar results can be cluttered with dissertations, master's theses, undergraduate theses, and open access material (some of which is low quality).
- Many curated databases are subject-specific, whereas Google Scholar is hugely multidisciplinary. The right curated database would give you targeted, disciplinary results.
- Google Scholar poses an additional layer of getting to the full text.
Advantages of Google Scholar:
- One advantage is the ability to do citation mapping. Click on "Cited by" to see article citations that cite the article at hand. The articles will necessarily be more recent and may give you more material on your topic.
- It will help to use a variety of databases, especially if you are having trouble finding enough material. Google Scholar is a great additional tool to use in such cases.