Skip to main content

WRPR 158: User Generated Content (HC)

Writing Program 158A01 & 02: User Generated Content: Popular Culture in a Digital World (Bradway) Fall 2013

Introduction

This guide includes links to (and instructions for searching) catalogs and databases, which you will use to find "one major, recent article, essay, or chapter" that engages with—and provides context for—the issue that you will be addressing in Essay #2.

As you conduct your search, keep in mind the following questions to help you select high-quality and relevant resources:

    • Evidence/Purpose – What kind of resource do you need to support your argument?  How will you use that article, essay, or chapter in your own argument?  (E.g., Will you be using the resource to support or elaborate on your own argument, to contextualize your argument, or to provide a counterargument to your own?)

    • Audience – For whom is the resource intended?  Researchers, undergraduates, the general public?

    • Citation Impact – To what extent has the resource been cited by other scholars?  (N.B.: citation statistics are a useful measure of impact, but they can be incomplete and, therefore, should not be treated as definitive.)

    • Discipline - Is the resource written from within a particular discipline?  For example, is the book or article meant for historians, literary scholars, art historians?  You will want to consider this question once you have found resources, but it is also a useful question to ask about your own argument.  Knowing your own approach will help you to know where to look—in which databases and so on—for secondary literature.

    • Expertise - What is the author's training?  Has the book or article been reviewed by other experts in the field (i.e., has it been peer-reviewed)?

    • Timeliness - When was the book or article published?  Recently published works will reflect current scholarship on a topic.

    • Objectivity - Does the author present a balanced point point of view?  In other words, does the author present competing interpretations fairly or are alternative readings misrepresented in service of the author's agenda?  Does the tone seem objective or overly emotional?

    • Documentation - Does the author adequately cite other literature relevant to his or her argument?  Of what quality are these citations?  (If the author includes quality secondary sources, you can use his or her bibliography to find further resources for your own project.)

See these resources for further information on evaluating secondary literature:

Subject Guide